Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 2400 Pro PCI-E Riva TNT2 Pro
Red Dead Redemption 2 6893% 27336%
Halo: Reach 2122% 8618%
Cyberpunk 2077 9508% 37592%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6893% 27336%
Doom Eternal 5913% 23490%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 9508% 37592%
Grand Theft Auto VI 10586% 41823%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4214% 16823%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 9508% 37592%
Need For Speed Heat 6893% 27336%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 2400 Pro PCI-E are massively better than the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro.

The HD 2400 was released over three years more recently than the Riva TNT2 Pro, and so the HD 2400 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Riva TNT2 Pro when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The HD 2400 has 224 MB more video memory than the Riva TNT2 Pro, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the HD 2400 also has superior memory performance overall.

The HD 2400 has 3.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Riva TNT2 Pro, which means that the memory performance of the HD 2400 is marginally better than the Riva TNT2 Pro.

The Radeon HD 2400 Pro PCI-E has 40 Shader Processing Units and the Riva TNT2 Pro has 2. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 2400 is 21 and the actual shader performance of the Riva TNT2 Pro is 0. The HD 2400 having 21 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 2400 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Riva TNT2 Pro.

The Radeon HD 2400 Pro PCI-E requires 25 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Riva TNT2 Pro.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed525 MHzvs143 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
OC Potential Good vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Jun 2007vs12 Oct 1999
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvs32 MB
Memory Speed400 MHzvs166 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth6.4GB/secvs2.7GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units40vs2
Actual Shader Performance1%vs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate2.1 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate2.1 GPixel/svs-

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model4.0vs-
Open GL3.1vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Pentium D 940 3.2 GHz-
Recommended RAM2 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution800x600-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 2400 Pro PCI-E is a variant of the reference Radeon HD 2400 Pro that features a PCI-E interface instead of AGP and performs like the AGP version.The RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants