Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 4 MX 4000 GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 19053% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 17417% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 16849% 17757%
FIFA 21 9561% 10079%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 16849% 17757%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 27358% 28829%
Watch Dogs Legion 18375% 19364%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 18036% 19007%
Grand Theft Auto VI 26849% 28293%
Genshin Impact 19053% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 4 MX 4000 are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over a year more recently than the 4 MX, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the 4 MX.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 4 MX 4000 and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 1.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 4 MX, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is marginally better than the 4 MX.

The GeForce 4 MX 4000 has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7. However, the actual shader performance of the 4 MX is 1 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is 2. The GeForce 6200 TurboCache having 1 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 6200 TurboCache delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the 4 MX.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed250 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV18NV44
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date14 Dec 2003vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed166 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth1.3GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs7
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1600x1200vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX7.0vs9.0c
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL1.2vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce4 MX 4000 is part of the GeForce4 GPUS released by NVIDIA in 2002. Only compatible with DirectX 7 or less and with a max memory of 128 MB, it can't play today's games. Still, games before 2003 should be fully playable at max settings....The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-