Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon Xpress X200 Intel 865G
Cyberpunk 2077 17285% 19725%
Hitman 3 22515% 25689%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 15800% 18032%
Resident Evil 8 17285% 19725%
FIFA 21 8669% 9900%
Grand Theft Auto VI 24362% 27795%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 15285% 17444%
The Medium 21592% 24637%
Genshin Impact 17285% 19725%
Far Cry 6 25054% 28584%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon Xpress X200 are very slightly better than the Intel 865G.

The Radeon Xpress X200 was released over a year more recently than the 865G, and so the Radeon Xpress X200 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the 865G.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 865G has 16 MB video memory, but the Radeon Xpress X200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon Xpress X200 has 2 Shader Processing Units and the 865G has 0. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The 865G requires 13 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon Xpress X200.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs200 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS480Springdale
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2004vs01 May 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed400 MHzvs-
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs-
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs1280x1024
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-13 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0vs7.0
Shader Model-vs-
Open GL2.0vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon Xpress X200 is a very old GPU part of the Radeon Xpress Series released by ATI, now known as AMD, between 2004 and 2005.
It's an integrated GPU that uses up to 128MB of DDR, clocked at either 200MHz or 400MHz, system memory.
Its performance is horrible, even for today's forgiving games.
Intel 865G comes embedded on the Pentium 4, Pentium D, Pentium Extreme Edition, Celeron, Celeron D CPUS and features an Integrated GPU called Intel Extreme Graphics 2.
It only supports DirectX up to 7.0 so even DirectX 8/9 games aren't (hardware) supported. The performance is ridiculous and even very old games (before 2003) might require reduced settings. Today's games are, obviously, unplayable.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-