Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon Xpress X200 GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 17285% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 15800% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 15285% 17757%
FIFA 21 8669% 10079%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 15285% 17757%
Watch Dogs Legion 16669% 19364%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 24823% 28829%
Grand Theft Auto VI 24362% 28293%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 16362% 19007%
Genshin Impact 17285% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon Xpress X200 are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released less than a year after the Radeon Xpress X200, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 128 MB video memory, but the Radeon Xpress X200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon Xpress X200 has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon Xpress X200 is 0 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is 2. The GeForce 6200 TurboCache having 2 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Radeon Xpress X200 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS480NV44
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2004vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed400 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs7
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0vs9.0c
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL2.0vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon Xpress X200 is a very old GPU part of the Radeon Xpress Series released by ATI, now known as AMD, between 2004 and 2005.
It's an integrated GPU that uses up to 128MB of DDR, clocked at either 200MHz or 400MHz, system memory.
Its performance is horrible, even for today's forgiving games.
The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-