Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce Go 7600 512MB DDR2 Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3
Cyberpunk 2077 6143% 7190%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 5610% 6568%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 5425% 6352%
FIFA 21 3049% 3577%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 5425% 6352%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 4983% 5835%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 8850% 10352%
Watch Dogs Legion 5922% 6932%
Genshin Impact 6143% 7190%
Grand Theft Auto VI 8685% 10158%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce Go 7600 512MB DDR2 are very slightly better than the Nvidia Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3.

The NVS 140M was released over a year more recently than the Go 7600, and so the NVS 140M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Go 7600.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Go 7600 has 256 MB more video memory than the NVS 140M, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Go 7600 also has superior memory performance overall.

The Go 7600 has 1 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the NVS 140M, which means that the memory performance of the Go 7600 is marginally better than the NVS 140M.

The Go 7600 has 8 Shader Processing Units but the NVS 140M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 requires 10 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Go 7600.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed450 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureG73MG84M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Mar 2006vs05 Sep 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory512 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed380 MHzvs700 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth12.2GB/secvs11.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units8vs-
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology-vs80nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs1600x1200
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-10 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0vs10
Shader Model3.0vs4.0
Open GL2.1vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce Go 7600 512MB DDR2 is one of the variants of GeForce Go 7600.
Compared to the GeForce Go 7600, the bandwidth is much lower due to the fact it's paired with slow DDR2.
Quadro NVS 140M is a business card with support for special drivers that are certified for professional applications like Microsoft Office Suite, Hummingbird Exceed, Lotus Notes, etc. It's part of the Quadro NVS Mobile Series released by NVIDIA, in 2006/2007/2010.
Though business cards have no driver support for games, some of them deliver astonishing performance (e.g. Quadro 6000, Tesla C2075). Quadro NVS 140M, however, isn't one of them.
The performance is enough for all old games and some modern games like the Fifa Series but it's still incapable of playing today's games like Crysis 2 and Metro 2033, even at the lowest settings.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-