Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel 845GV Riva TNT2 Pro
Red Dead Redemption 2 29622% 27336%
Cyberpunk 2077 40733% 37592%
Doom Eternal 25456% 23490%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 18233% 16823%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29622% 27336%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 40733% 37592%
FIFA 20 15733% 14515%
Grand Theft Auto VI 45317% 41823%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 40733% 37592%
Need For Speed Heat 29622% 27336%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro are very slightly better than the Intel 845GV.

The 845GV has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The 845GV was released over a year more recently than the Riva TNT2 Pro, and so the 845GV is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Riva TNT2 Pro.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 32 MB video memory, but the 845GV does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The 845GV has 0 Shader Processing Units and the Riva TNT2 Pro has 2. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed-vs143 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-NV5
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Oct 2002vs12 Oct 1999
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory-vs32 MB
Memory Speed167 MHzvs166 MHz
Memory Bus-vs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs2.7GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs2
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX-vs6.0
Shader Model-vs-
Open GL-vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel 845GV comes embedded on the Celeron, Celeron D, Pentium 4 CPUS and features an Integrated GPU called ???.
Today's games are, obviously, unplayable.
The RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body