Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Riva TNT2 Pro GeForce 3 Ti 200
Red Dead Redemption 2 27336% 7033%
Halo: Reach 8618% 2167%
Cyberpunk 2077 37592% 9700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27336% 7033%
Doom Eternal 23490% 6033%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 37592% 9700%
Grand Theft Auto VI 41823% 10800%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 16823% 4300%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 37592% 9700%
Need For Speed Heat 27336% 7033%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 3 Ti 200 are massively better than the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro.

The 3 Ti was released over a year more recently than the Riva TNT2 Pro, and so the 3 Ti is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Riva TNT2 Pro.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 3 Ti has 32 MB more video memory than the Riva TNT2 Pro, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the 3 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.

The 3 Ti has 0.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Riva TNT2 Pro, which means that the memory performance of the 3 Ti is marginally better than the Riva TNT2 Pro.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 3 Ti 200 has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Riva TNT2 Pro is 0 and the actual shader performance of the 3 Ti is 1. The 3 Ti having 1 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the 3 Ti delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Riva TNT2 Pro.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed143 MHzvs175 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV5NV20
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date12 Oct 1999vs01 Oct 2001
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvs64 MB
Memory Speed166 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth2.7GB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX6.0vs8.1
Shader Model-vs1.1
Open GL1.2vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.GeForce 3 Ti 200 is a very old GPU part of the GeForce 3 Series released by NVIDIA in 2001.
It only supports DirectX up to 8.1 so even DirectX 9 games are most likely unplayable.
That being said, the 64MB video memory and very low core clock doom its performance from the start. Therefore, almost all today's games are unplayable, even at the lowest settings.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body