Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Riva TNT2 Pro Radeon HD 2400 Pro
Red Dead Redemption 2 27336% 6893%
Halo: Reach 8618% 2122%
Cyberpunk 2077 37592% 9508%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27336% 6893%
Doom Eternal 23490% 5913%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 37592% 9508%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 956% 169%
Grand Theft Auto VI 41823% 10586%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 37592% 9508%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 16823% 4214%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 2400 Pro are massively better than the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro.

The HD 2400 was released over three years more recently than the Riva TNT2 Pro, and so the HD 2400 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Riva TNT2 Pro when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The HD 2400 has 224 MB more video memory than the Riva TNT2 Pro, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the HD 2400 also has superior memory performance overall.

The HD 2400 has 3.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Riva TNT2 Pro, which means that the memory performance of the HD 2400 is marginally better than the Riva TNT2 Pro.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 2400 Pro has 40. However, the actual shader performance of the Riva TNT2 Pro is 0 and the actual shader performance of the HD 2400 is 21. The HD 2400 having 21 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 2400 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Riva TNT2 Pro.

The Radeon HD 2400 Pro requires 20 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Riva TNT2 Pro. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the HD 2400, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the Riva TNT2 Pro.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed143 MHzvs525 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV5RV610
OC Potential - vs Good
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date12 Oct 1999vs28 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed166 MHzvs400 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth2.7GB/secvs6.4GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs40
Actual Shader Performance-vs1%
Technology-vs65nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs4
Texture Rate-vs2.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units-vs4
Pixel Rate-vs2.1 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-20 Watts
Recommended PSU-300 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX6.0vs10
Shader Model-vs4.0
Open GL1.2vs3.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Pentium D 940 3.2 GHz
Recommended RAM-2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-800x600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.Radeon HD 2400 Pro is an entry-level GPU based on the 65nm variant of the second unified shader architecture, R600.
It's based on the RV610 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 64-bit memory interface of standard DDR2. The central unit runs at 525MHz and the memory clock runs at up to 400MHz. It's therefore a higher clocked Radeon HD 2350 Pro and should only be somewhat faster.
Today's games only playable at unattractive resolutions and using low (most likely) or medium (maybe) presets. Its performance, is however, quite superior to the integrated Radeon HD 2100. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-

Title

Body