Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Riva TNT2 Pro GeForce 6200
Red Dead Redemption 2 27336% 18348%
Halo: Reach 8618% 5762%
Cyberpunk 2077 37592% 25245%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27336% 18348%
Doom Eternal 23490% 15762%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 37592% 25245%
Grand Theft Auto VI 41823% 28090%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 16823% 11279%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 37592% 25245%
Need For Speed Heat 27336% 18348%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6200 are significantly better than the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro.

The GeForce 6200 was released over three years more recently than the Riva TNT2 Pro, and so the GeForce 6200 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Riva TNT2 Pro when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6200 has 224 MB more video memory than the Riva TNT2 Pro, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce 6200 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce 6200 has 6.1 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Riva TNT2 Pro, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 6200 is marginally better than the Riva TNT2 Pro.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Riva TNT2 Pro is 0 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6200 is 1. The GeForce 6200 having 1 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 6200 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Riva TNT2 Pro.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed143 MHzvs300 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV5NV43
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date12 Oct 1999vs02 Jan 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed166 MHzvs275 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth2.7GB/secvs8.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX6.0vs9.0c
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL1.2vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body