Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Riva TNT2 Pro Radeon X1200 128mb
Red Dead Redemption 2 27336% 29622%
Cyberpunk 2077 37592% 40733%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 16823% 18233%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 37592% 40733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27336% 29622%
Doom Eternal 23490% 25456%
FIFA 20 14515% 15733%
Grand Theft Auto VI 41823% 45317%
Need For Speed Heat 27336% 29622%
Halo: Reach 8618% 9344%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon X1200 128mb.

The Radeon X1200 128mb was released over three years more recently than the Riva TNT2 Pro, and so the Radeon X1200 128mb is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Riva TNT2 Pro when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon X1200 128mb has 96 MB more video memory than the Riva TNT2 Pro, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the Riva TNT2 Pro has superior memory performance.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 2.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon X1200 128mb, which means that the memory performance of the Riva TNT2 Pro is marginally better than the Radeon X1200 128mb.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon X1200 128mb has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Riva TNT2 Pro is 0 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon X1200 128mb is 1. The Radeon X1200 128mb having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Riva TNT2 Pro performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed143 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV5RS690C
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date12 Oct 1999vs28 Feb 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed166 MHzvs-
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth2.7GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX6.0vs9.0b
Shader Model-vs2.0
Open GL1.2vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.Radeon X1200 is known as Radeon Xpress 1200. Check its page to know more about it.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body