Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Riva TNT2 Pro Riva TNT2
Red Dead Redemption 2 27336% 27336%
Cyberpunk 2077 37592% 37592%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 16823% 16823%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 37592% 37592%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27336% 27336%
Doom Eternal 23490% 23490%
FIFA 20 14515% 14515%
Grand Theft Auto VI 41823% 41823%
Need For Speed Heat 27336% 27336%
Halo: Reach 8618% 8618%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Riva TNT2 Pro and the Riva TNT2 are equal.

The Riva TNT2 Pro was released less than a year after the Riva TNT2, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Riva TNT2 Pro and the Riva TNT2 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 0.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Riva TNT2, which means that the memory performance of the Riva TNT2 Pro is marginally better than the Riva TNT2.

Both the Riva TNT2 Pro and the Riva TNT2 have 2 Shader Processing Units. Having the same number of SPUs and using the same architecture means that the performance they offer can be compared by looking at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed143 MHzvs125 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV5NV5
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date12 Oct 1999vs15 Mar 1999
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvs32 MB
Memory Speed166 MHzvs150 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth2.7GB/secvs2.4GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX6.0vs6.0
Shader Model-vs-
Open GL1.2vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.The RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body