Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Riva TNT2 Pro Rage 128 Pro
Halo: Reach 8618% 8400%
Cyberpunk 2077 37592% 36650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27336% 26650%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 16823% 16400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27336% 26650%
Doom Eternal 23490% 22900%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 37592% 36650%
Grand Theft Auto VI 41823% 40775%
FIFA 20 14515% 14150%
Need For Speed Heat 27336% 26650%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Rage 128 Pro are marginally better than the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro.

The Riva TNT2 Pro was released less than a year after the Rage 128 Pro, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Riva TNT2 Pro and the Rage 128 Pro have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 0.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Rage 128 Pro, which means that the memory performance of the Riva TNT2 Pro is marginally better than the Rage 128 Pro.

Both the Riva TNT2 Pro and the Rage 128 Pro have 2 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed143 MHzvs125 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV5-
OC Potential - vs None
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date12 Oct 1999vs01 Aug 1999
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvs32 MB
Memory Speed166 MHzvs143 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth2.7GB/secvs2.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX6.0vs6.0
Shader Model-vs-
Open GL1.2vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.Later, ATI developed a successor to the original Rage 128, called the Rage 128 Pro. This chip carried several enhancements, including an enhanced triangle setup engine that doubled geometry throughput to eight million triangles/s, better texture filtering, DirectX 6.0 texture compression, AGP 4, DVI support, and a Rage Theater chip for composite and S-Video TV-in. This chip was used on the gamer-oriented Rage Fury Pro boards and the business-oriented Xpert 2000 PRO.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body