Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Vanta LT Radeon 9250
Halo: Reach 8400% 2963%
Cyberpunk 2077 36650% 13143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 26650% 9540%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 16400% 5846%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 26650% 9540%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 36650% 13143%
Doom Eternal 22900% 8188%
Grand Theft Auto VI 40775% 14630%
FIFA 20 14150% 5035%
Need For Speed Heat 26650% 9540%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon 9250 are massively better than the Nvidia Vanta LT.

The Radeon 9250 was released over three years more recently than the Vanta LT, and so the Radeon 9250 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Vanta LT when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon 9250 has 112 MB more video memory than the Vanta LT, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Radeon 9250 also has superior memory performance overall.

The Vanta LT has 796.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon 9250, which means that the memory performance of the Vanta LT is massively better than the Radeon 9250.

The Vanta LT has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon 9250 has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Vanta LT is 0 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon 9250 is 1. The Radeon 9250 having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Vanta LT performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed80 MHzvs240 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV6RV280
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Mar 2000vs02 Jan 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory16 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed100 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth800MB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX6.0vs8.1
Shader Model-vs1.4
Open GL1.2vs1.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe NVIDIA Vanta is a low-cost, 128-bit TwiN Texel, highly integrated 3D graphics processor, designed specifically for value-conscious users. Leveraging the NVIDIA TNT architecture, NVIDIA Vanta delivers breakthrough 3D and industry-leading 2D graphics performance, making it ideal for today's basic desktop PC. The NVIDIA Vanta comes in 4-16MB configurations. The Radeon R200 is the second generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The architecture features 3D acceleration based upon Microsoft Direct3D 8.0 and OpenGL 1.3, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R100 design. The GPU also includes 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. 'R200' refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. It is the basis for a variety of other succeeding products.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body