Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Rage 128 Pro GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 28150% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 25738% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 24900% 17757%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 24900% 17757%
FIFA 21 14150% 10079%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 22900% 16329%
Genshin Impact 28150% 20079%
Grand Theft Auto VI 39650% 28293%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 40400% 28829%
Watch Dogs Legion 27150% 19364%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache are significantly better than the AMD Rage 128 Pro.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over three years more recently than the Rage 128 Pro, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Rage 128 Pro when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 96 MB more video memory than the Rage 128 Pro, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce 6200 TurboCache also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 0.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Rage 128 Pro, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is marginally better than the Rage 128 Pro.

The Rage 128 Pro has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7. However, the actual shader performance of the Rage 128 Pro is 0 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is 2. The GeForce 6200 TurboCache having 2 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 6200 TurboCache delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Rage 128 Pro.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed125 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-NV44
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Aug 1999vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed143 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth2.3GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs7
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX6.0vs9.0c
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL1.2vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewLater, ATI developed a successor to the original Rage 128, called the Rage 128 Pro. This chip carried several enhancements, including an enhanced triangle setup engine that doubled geometry throughput to eight million triangles/s, better texture filtering, DirectX 6.0 texture compression, AGP 4, DVI support, and a Rage Theater chip for composite and S-Video TV-in. This chip was used on the gamer-oriented Rage Fury Pro boards and the business-oriented Xpert 2000 PRO.The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-