Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel GMA X3100 Radeon 9250
Halo: Reach 3169% 2963%
Cyberpunk 2077 14035% 13143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10188% 9540%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 6246% 5846%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10188% 9540%
Doom Eternal 8746% 8188%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 14035% 13143%
Grand Theft Auto VI 15621% 14630%
FIFA 20 5381% 5035%
Need For Speed Heat 10188% 9540%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon 9250 are very slightly better than the Intel GMA X3100.

The GMA X3100 was released over three years more recently than the Radeon 9250, and so the GMA X3100 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon 9250 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GMA X3100 has 256 MB more video memory than the Radeon 9250, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the Radeon 9250 has superior memory performance.

The Radeon 9250 has 3.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GMA X3100, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon 9250 is marginally better than the GMA X3100.

The Radeon 9250 has 4 Shader Processing Units but the GMA X3100 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed500 MHzvs240 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-RV280
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date09 May 2007vs02 Jan 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs200 MHz
Memory Bus-vs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1600x1200vs2048x1536
VGA Connections-vs1
DVI Connections-vs1
HDMI Connections-vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9vs8.1
Shader Model-vs1.4
Open GL-vs1.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Intel Graphics Media Accelerator, or GMA, is Intel's current line of integrated graphics processors built into various motherboard chipsets.
These integrated graphics products allow a computer to be built without a separate graphics card, which can reduce cost, power consumption and noise. They are commonly found on low-priced notebook and desktop computers as well as business computers, which do not need high levels of graphics capability. 90% of all PCs sold have integrated graphics. They rely on the computer's main memory for storage, which imposes a performance penalty, as both the CPU and GPU have to access memory over the same bus.
The Radeon R200 is the second generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The architecture features 3D acceleration based upon Microsoft Direct3D 8.0 and OpenGL 1.3, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R100 design. The GPU also includes 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. 'R200' refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. It is the basis for a variety of other succeeding products.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body