Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Celeron P4500 | Athlon Neo X2 Dual Core L325 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 612% | 1019% |
Hitman 3 | 858% | 1406% |
Resident Evil 8 | 691% | 1142% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 858% | 1406% |
FIFA 21 | 566% | 946% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1070% | 1739% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 590% | 984% |
Genshin Impact | 439% | 747% |
Far Cry 6 | 1023% | 1665% |
The Medium | 1121% | 1819% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Celeron P4500 is noticeably better than the AMD Athlon Neo X2 Dual Core L325 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.
The Celeron P4500 was released less than a year after the Athlon Neo X2, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.
The Celeron P4500 and the Athlon Neo X2 both have 2 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Celeron P4500 and the Athlon Neo X2 may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.
More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.
The Celeron P4500 and Athlon Neo X2 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Celeron P4500 has a 0.36 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.
The Athlon Neo X2 has a 512 KB bigger L2 cache than the Celeron P4500, and although the Athlon Neo X2 does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.
The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.
The Athlon Neo X2 has a 17 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Celeron P4500. However, the Celeron P4500 was created with a 33 nm smaller manufacturing technology. Overall, by taking both into account, the Celeron P4500 is likely the CPU with the lower heat production and power requirements, by quite a wide margin.
CPU Codename | Arrandale | Conesus | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MoBo Socket | rPGA 988A / B / Socket G1 / G2 | Socket 812 | |||
Notebook CPU | yes | yes | |||
Release Date | 28 Mar 2010 | 01 Jun 2009 | |||
CPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() |
CPU Cores | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clock Speed | 1.86 GHz | ![]() | vs | 1.5 GHz | |
Turbo Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
Max TDP | 35 W | vs | ![]() | 18 W | |
Lithography | 32 nm | ![]() | vs | 65 nm | |
Bit Width | - | vs | - | ||
Virtualization Technology | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
L1 Cache Size | 128 KB | vs | ![]() | 256 KB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L2 Cache Size | 512 KB | vs | ![]() | 1024 KB | |
L3 Cache Size | 2 MB | ![]() | vs | - | |
ECC Memory Support | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
Graphics | no | no |
---|
Package Size | - | vs | - | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Configurations | - | vs | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | The Celeron is a family of microprocessors from Intel targeted at the low-end consumer market. CPUs in the Celeron brand have used designs from sixth- to eighth-generation CPU microarchitectures. | With 27 mm × 27 mm in size and 2.5 mm in thickness, the Athlon Neo processors utilize a new package called "ASB1", essentially a BGA package, for smaller footprint to allow smaller designs for notebooks and lowering the cost. The clock of the processors is significantly lower than desktop and other mobile counterparts to reach a low TDP, at 15W maximum for a single core x86-64 CPU at 1.6 GHz. The Athlon Neo processors are equipped with 512 KB of L2 cache and HyperTransport 1.0 running at 800 MHz frequency. |
---|