Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Opteron 2212 X2 Opteron 1352
Cyberpunk 2077 319% 266%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 464% 393%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 306% 255%
FIFA 21 292% 242%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 374% 315%
Watch Dogs Legion 464% 393%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 551% 469%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 374% 315%
Grand Theft Auto VI 588% 502%
Genshin Impact 217% 177%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Opteron 1352 is very slightly better than the AMD Opteron 2212 X2 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Opteron 1352 was released less than a year after the Opteron 2212 X2, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

The Opteron 1352 has 2 more cores than the Opteron 2212 X2. With 4 cores, the Opteron 1352 is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Opteron 2212 X2 and Opteron 1352 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Opteron 1352 has a 0.1 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. As such, we need to look elsewhere for more reliable comparisons.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Opteron 2212 X2 and the Opteron 1352 have the same L2 cache size, but the Opteron 2212 X2 does not appear to have an L3 cache, so the Opteron 1352 definitely wins out in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Opteron 2212 X2 has a 20 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Opteron 1352. However, the Opteron 1352 was created with a 25 nm smaller manufacturing technology. Overall, by taking both into account, the Opteron 1352 is likely the CPU with the lower heat production and power requirements, by quite a wide margin.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameSanta RosaBudapest
MoBo SocketSocket FSocket AM2+
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date15 Aug 200601 Apr 2008
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs4
Clock Speed2 GHzvs2.1 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP95 Wvs115 W
Lithography90 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width-vs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size256 KBvs512 KB
L2 Cache Size2048 KBvs2048 KB
L2 Cache Speed-vs-
L3 Cache Size-vs2 MB
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewFor Socket F and Socket AM2 Opterons, each chip has a four-digit model number, in the form Opteron XZYY. For all Opterons, the first digit (the X) specifies the number of CPUs on the target machine:
1 - Designed for uniprocessor systems
2 - Designed for dual-processor systems
8 - Designed for systems with 4 or 8 processors
For Socket F and Socket AM2 Opterons, the second digit (the Z) represents the processor generation. Presently, only 2 (dual-core), DDR2, 3 (quad-core) and 4 (six-core) are used.
For all Opterons, the last two digits in the model number (the YY) indicate the clock frequency of a CPU, a higher number indicating a higher clock frequency. This speed indication is comparable to processors of the same generation if they have the same amount of cores, single-cores and dual-cores have different indications despite sometimes having the same clock frequency.
The suffix HE or EE indicates a high-efficiency/energy-efficiency model having a lower TDP than a standard Opteron. The suffix SE indicates a top-of-the-line model having a higher TDP than a standard Opteron.
Opteron is AMD's x86 server and workstation processor line, and was the first processor to implement the AMD64 instruction set architecture (known generically as x86-64). It was released on April 22, 2003 with the SledgeHammer core (K8) and was intended to compete in the server and workstation markets, particularly in the same segment as the Intel Xeon processor. Processors based on the AMD K10 microarchitecture (codenamed Barcelona) were announced on September 10, 2007 featuring a new quad-core configuration. The most-recently released Opteron CPUs are the 8- and 12-core Socket G34 Opterons, code-named Magny-Cours.