Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Athlon Neo X2 Dual Core L325 | Atom N470 1.83GHz |
Hitman 3 | 1406% | 3354% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1019% | 2466% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 1406% | 3354% |
Resident Evil 8 | 1142% | 2749% |
FIFA 21 | 946% | 2299% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1739% | 4117% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 984% | 2386% |
Genshin Impact | 747% | 1842% |
Far Cry 6 | 1665% | 3947% |
The Medium | 1819% | 4302% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Athlon Neo X2 Dual Core L325 is noticeably better than the Intel Atom N470 1.83GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.
The Atom N470 1.83GHz was released less than a year after the Athlon Neo X2, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.
The Athlon Neo X2 has 1 more core than the Atom N470 1.83GHz. However, while the Athlon Neo X2 will probably perform better than the Atom N470 1.83GHz, both CPUs are likely to struggle with the latest games, and will almost certainly bottleneck high-end graphics cards. Both CPUs also have quite low clock frequencies, which means recent games will have to be played at low settings, assuming you own an equivalently powerful GPU.
More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.
The Athlon Neo X2 and Atom N470 1.83GHz are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Atom N470 1.83GHz has a 0.33 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the Athlon Neo X2.
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.
The Athlon Neo X2 has a 512 KB bigger L2 cache than the Atom N470 1.83GHz, but neither of the CPUs have L3 caches, so the Athlon Neo X2 wins out in this area with its larger L2 cache.
The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.
The Atom N470 1.83GHz has a 11 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Athlon Neo X2, and was created with a 20 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Atom N470 1.83GHz will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).
CPU Codename | Conesus | Pineview | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MoBo Socket | Socket 812 | Socket 559 | |||
Notebook CPU | yes | yes | |||
Release Date | 01 Jun 2009 | 28 Feb 2010 | |||
CPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() |
CPU Cores | 2 | ![]() | vs | 1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz | vs | ![]() | 1.83 GHz | |
Turbo Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
Max TDP | 18 W | vs | ![]() | 7 W | |
Lithography | 65 nm | vs | ![]() | 45 nm | |
Bit Width | - | vs | - | ||
Virtualization Technology | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
L1 Cache Size | 256 KB | ![]() | vs | 56 KB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L2 Cache Size | 1024 KB | ![]() | vs | 512 KB | |
L3 Cache Size | - | vs | - | ||
ECC Memory Support | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
Graphics | no | no |
---|
Package Size | - | vs | - | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Configurations | - | vs | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | With 27 mm × 27 mm in size and 2.5 mm in thickness, the Athlon Neo processors utilize a new package called "ASB1", essentially a BGA package, for smaller footprint to allow smaller designs for notebooks and lowering the cost. The clock of the processors is significantly lower than desktop and other mobile counterparts to reach a low TDP, at 15W maximum for a single core x86-64 CPU at 1.6 GHz. The Athlon Neo processors are equipped with 512 KB of L2 cache and HyperTransport 1.0 running at 800 MHz frequency. | Intel Atom is the brand name for a line of ultra-low-voltage x86 and x86-64 CPUs (or microprocessors) from Intel, designed in 45 nm CMOS and used mainly in netbooks, nettops, and Mobile Internet devices (MIDs) Intel Atom is a direct successor of the Intel A100 and A110 low-power microprocessors (code-named Stealey), which were built on a 90 nm process, had 512 KB L2 cache and run at 600 MHz/800 MHz with 3W TDP (Thermal Design Power). Prior to the Silverthorne announcement, outside sources had speculated that Atom would compete with AMD's Geode system-on-a-chip processors, used by the One Laptop per Child project, and other cost- and power-sensitive applications for x86 processors. However, Intel revealed on October 15, 2007 that it was developing another new mobile processor, codenamed Diamondville, for OLPC-type devices. |
---|