Select any two CPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Sempron 2600+ Athlon XP 3500+
Cyberpunk 2077 2107% 1708%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 2871% 2334%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 2039% 1652%
Watch Dogs Legion 2871% 2334%
FIFA 21 1964% 1591%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2400% 1948%
Godfall 4162% 3392%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3527% 2872%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 3331% 2711%
Genshin Impact 1571% 1269%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Athlon XP 3500+ is marginally better than the AMD Sempron 2600+ when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Sempron 2600+ was released over three years more recently than the Athlon XP 3500+, and so the Sempron 2600+ is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Athlon XP 3500+ when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful CPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Sempron 2600+ and the Athlon XP 3500+ both have 1 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Sempron 2600+ and the Athlon XP 3500+ may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Sempron 2600+ and Athlon XP 3500+ are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Sempron 2600+ has a 1.833 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameThoroughbred (Model 8)-
MoBo SocketSocket 462/Socket ANot sure
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date28 Jul 2004-
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores1vs1
Clock Speed1.833 GHzvs-
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP62 Wvs-
Lithography130 nmvs-
Bit Width-vs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs-
L2 Cache Size256 KBvs-
L3 Cache Size-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno

CPU Graphics


CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewSempron has been the marketing name used by AMD for several different budget desktop CPUs, using several different technologies and CPU socket formats. The Sempron replaced the AMD Duron processor and competes against Intel's Celeron series of processors. AMD coined the name from the Latin semper, which means always, to suggest the Sempron is suitable for daily use, practical, and part of everyday life.This CPU does not exist.