Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Phenom II X4 905e Core 2 Extreme QX6800 2.93GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 95% 83%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 163% 147%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 89% 78%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 121% 108%
FIFA 21 82% 71%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 110% 97%
Genshin Impact 48% 39%
Grand Theft Auto VI 221% 201%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 203% 185%
Watch Dogs Legion 163% 147%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800 2.93GHz is very slightly better than the AMD Phenom II X4 905e when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Phenom II X4 was released over a year more recently than the Core 2 Extreme, and so the Phenom II X4 is likely to have better levels of support, and will be more optimized for running the latest games.

The Phenom II X4 and the Core 2 Extreme both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming.

Both the AMD Phenom II X4 905e and the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800 2.93GHz have the same number of threads. Both CPUs have one thread per physical core.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Phenom II X4 and Core 2 Extreme are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core 2 Extreme has a 0.43 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Core 2 Extreme has a 6144 KB bigger L2 cache than the Phenom II X4, and although the Core 2 Extreme does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Phenom II X4 has a 65 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Core 2 Extreme, and was created with a 20 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Phenom II X4 will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameDenebKentsfield
MoBo SocketSocket AM3LGA 775/ Socket T
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date02 Jun 200909 Apr 2007
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores4vs4
CPU Threads4vs4
Clock Speed2.5 GHzvs2.93 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP65 Wvs130 W
Lithography45 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs64 Bit
Max Temperature70°Cvs65°C
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size64 KBvs256 KB
L2 Cache Size2048 KBvs8192 KB
L3 Cache Size6 MBvs-
Memory Channels-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewPhenom II X4 905e is an energy efficient processor based on the 45nm, K10 architecture.

It offers 4 Physical Cores (4 Logical), clocked at 2.5GHz and 6MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Virtualization is activated and the clock multiplier is unlocked, meaning it can be overclocked easily.

The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 65W.

It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications.
Core 2 Extreme QX6800 2.93GHz is a performance Processor based on the 65nm Core micro-architecture.

It offers 4 Physical Cores (4 Logical), clocked at 2.93GHz and 8MB of L2 Cache.
Among its many features, Virtualization is activated.

The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 130W.

It offers average performance. It will therefore become a bottleneck in today's demanding games.