0.7
Check Prices $122
3.2
Check Prices $885
Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Core i3-9100F 4-Core 3.6GHz Xeon E5-2640 v2
Red Dead Redemption 2 41% 21%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4% 11%
Halo: Reach 42% 50%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 55% 33%
Cyberpunk 2077 19% 2%
Borderlands 3 41% 21%
FIFA 20 1% 14%
Halo: The Master Chief Collection 41% 21%
eFootball PES 2020 16% 1%
Detroit: Become Human 20% 3%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 is massively better than the Intel Core i3-9100F 4-Core 3.6GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Core i3-9100F 4-Core was released over three years more recently than the Xeon E5-2640 v2, and so the Core i3-9100F 4-Core is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Xeon E5-2640 v2 when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).

The Xeon E5-2640 v2 has 4 more cores than the Core i3-9100F 4-Core. 8 cores is probably excessive if you mean to just run the latest games, as games are not yet able to harness this many cores. The cores in the Core i3-9100F 4-Core is more than enough for gaming purposes. However, if you intend on running a server with the Xeon E5-2640 v2, it would seem to be a decent choice.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Core i3-9100F 4-Core and Xeon E5-2640 v2 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core i3-9100F 4-Core has a 1.6 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the Xeon E5-2640 v2 is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Core i3-9100F 4-Core has a 768 KB bigger L2 cache than the Xeon E5-2640 v2, which means that it, at worst, wins out in this area, and at best, will provide superior gaming performance and will work much better with high-end graphics cards.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Core i3-9100F 4-Core has a 30 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Xeon E5-2640 v2, and was created with a 8 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Core i3-9100F 4-Core will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameCoffee Lake RIvy Bridge
MoBo SocketLGA 1151LGA 2011/Socket R
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date23 Apr 201910 Sep 2014
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores4vs8
CPU Threads4vs-
Clock Speed3.6 GHzvs2 GHz
Turbo Frequency4.2 GHzvs2.5 GHz
Max TDP65 Wvs95 W
Lithography14 nmvs22 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs64 Bit
Voltage Range-vs0.651.30V KB
Max Temperature100°Cvs75°C
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size256 KBvs-
L2 Cache Size1024 KBvs256 KB
L3 Cache Size6144 MBvs20 MB
Max Memory Size-vs-
Memory Channels-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsno
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size37.5mm x 37.5mmvs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Core i3-9100F 4-Core 3.6GHz is a low-end desktop CPU based on a refinement of the 14nm++ Coffee Lake microarchitecture. It is identical to the Core i3-9100 except it does not feature integrated graphics. It offers 4 physical cores (4 logical), initially clocked at 3.6GHz, which may go up to 4.2GHz using 4 cores with Turbo Boost. The i3-9100F has 6MB of L3 Cache. This chip supports up to 64GB DDR-2666 MHz memory. Among its many features, Turbo Boost 2.0, Optane Memory Support, and Virtualization are activated. It does not feature an unlocked multiplier and therefore cannot be overclocked using traditional methods. This Core i3-9100F CPU offers average gaming performance in 2019 and may be a minor bottleneck in a modern gaming PC. It should be able to play most modern games at 60fps on High graphics performance at any supported resolution without being a hindrance to the accompanying GPU, although may struggle with the most demanding AAA titles. Performance may become bottlenecked if playing at 144Hz and 1080p or lower screen resolution.Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 is a Server CPU part of the Xeon E5 v2 Series released by Intel in September 2013.
It's based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and the memory controller supports DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 and DDR3-1600.
It has 8 cores.
The performance of this server processor is excellent.

Title

Body