9.9
Check Prices
Estimated Price:
$277.00 -4%
Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Ryzen 7 2700X Xeon E5-2687W
Cyberpunk 2077 53% 39%
Hitman 3 37% 18%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 37% 18%
The Medium 19% 4%
Resident Evil 8 48% 32%
FIFA 21 56% 43%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 54% 41%
Grand Theft Auto VI 23% 0%
Genshin Impact 64% 54%
Far Cry 6 26% 4%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is massively better than the Intel Xeon E5-2687W when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Ryzen 7 2700X was released over three years more recently than the Xeon E5-2687W, and so the Ryzen 7 2700X is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Xeon E5-2687W when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).

The Ryzen 7 2700X and the Xeon E5-2687W both have 8 cores. Games are not yet able to harness this many cores, so it is probably excessive if you mean to just run the latest games; however, if you intend on running a server with this CPU, it would seem to be a decent choice.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Ryzen 7 2700X and Xeon E5-2687W are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Ryzen 7 2700X has a 0.6 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Ryzen 7 2700X has a 2048 KB bigger L2 cache than the Xeon E5-2687W, but on the other hand, it is the Xeon E5-2687W that has a 4 MB bigger L3 cache than the Ryzen 7 2700X. In this case, the L2 size is probably what counts, so the Ryzen 7 2700X is likely superior in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Ryzen 7 2700X has a 55 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Xeon E5-2687W, and was created with a 20 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Ryzen 7 2700X will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameZen+Sandy Bridge-EP
MoBo SocketSocket AM4LGA 2011/Socket R
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date30 Apr 201806 Mar 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores8vs8
CPU Threads16vs-
Clock Speed3.7 GHzvs3.1 GHz
Turbo Frequency4.3 GHzvs-
Max TDP95 Wvs150 W
Lithography12 nmvs32 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size512 KBvs256 KB
L2 Cache Size4096 KBvs2048 KB
L3 Cache Size16 MBvs20 MB
Max Memory Size-vs-
Memory Channels-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsno
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8-Core 3.7GHz is a high-end CPU based on the 12nm Zen+ microarchitecture. It offers 8 physical cores (16 threads), initially clocked at 3.7GHz base clock and 4.3GHz boost with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and 16MB of L3 Cache. Among its many features are Simultaneous Multithreading, Cool n Quiet, CoolCore Technology, Extended Frequency Range (XFX) 2.0, Pure Power and Precision Boost 2.0. This CPU is likely to offer exceptional computational performance and will not be the bottleneck in any modern gaming PC. It will be able to play all modern games comfortably on high/ultra graphics performance without being a hindrance to the accompanying GPU.Intel Xeon E5-2687W is a Server CPU part of the Xeon E5 Series released by Intel in 2012.
It's based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and the memory controller supports DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 and DDR3-1600.
It has 8 cores and each core has 2 threads, make a total of 16. Turbo Boost is also available.
The performance is astonishing and surpasses all Ivy Bridge desktop CPUs but comes at an extremely high price.