Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Phenom 9600 Quad-Core Black Edition Phenom 9750B Quad-Core
Cyberpunk 2077 125% 119%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 203% 195%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 118% 112%
Watch Dogs Legion 203% 195%
FIFA 21 111% 105%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 155% 148%
Godfall 335% 323%
Grand Theft Auto VI 270% 260%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 250% 240%
Genshin Impact 71% 66%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Phenom 9750B Quad-Core is marginally better than the AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core Black Edition when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Phenom 9750B Quad-Core was released less than a year after the Phenom 9600 Quad-Core, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

The Phenom 9600 Quad-Core and the Phenom 9750B Quad-Core both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming.

Both the AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core Black Edition and the AMD Phenom 9750B Quad-Core have the same number of threads. Both CPUs have one thread per physical core.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Phenom 9600 Quad-Core and the Phenom 9750B Quad-Core are from the same family of CPUs, and thus their clock speeds are directly comparable. With this in mind, it is safe to say that with a 0.1 GHz faster base clock rate, the Phenom 9750B Quad-Core manages to provide marginally better performance than the Phenom 9600 Quad-Core.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Phenom 9600 Quad-Core and the Phenom 9750B Quad-Core have the same L2 cache size, and the same L3 cache size, so in terms of cache-related gaming performance, we have to look back to the clock rate, where the Phenom 9750B Quad-Core wins out.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Phenom 9750B Quad-Core has a 30 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Phenom 9600 Quad-Core (though they were created with the same size 65 nm manufacturing technology). What this means is the Phenom 9750B Quad-Core will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameAgenaAgena
MoBo SocketSocket AM2+Socket AM2+
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date27 Mar 200815 Aug 2008
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores4vs4
CPU Threads4vs4
Clock Speed2.3 GHzvs2.4 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP125 Wvs95 W
Lithography65 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs64 Bit
Max Temperature70°Cvs70°C
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size512 KBvs256 KB
L1 Cache Count-vs4
L2 Cache Size2048 KBvs2048 KB
L2 Cache Count-vs4
L2 Cache Speed-vs-
L3 Cache Size2 MBvs2 MB
Memory Channels-vs2
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewPhenom 9600 Quad-Core Black Edition is a performance processor based on the 65nm, K10 architecture.

It offers 4 Physical Cores (4 Logical), clocked at 2.3GHz and 2MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Virtualization is activated and the processor has unlocked multiplier, meaning it can be overclocked easily.

The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 125W.

It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications.
Phenom 9750B Quad-Core is a business-class processor based on the 65nm, K10 architecture.

It offers 4 Physical Cores (4 Logical), clocked at 2.4GHz and 2MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Virtualization is activated.

The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 95W.

It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications.