Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game FX-8320E Xeon Processor E3110
Cyberpunk 2077 10% 299%
Hitman 3 48% 437%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 48% 437%
Resident Evil 8 22% 343%
FIFA 21 3% 273%
Grand Theft Auto VI 80% 556%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 6% 287%
Genshin Impact 17% 202%
The Medium 88% 585%
Far Cry 6 73% 529%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD FX-8320E is massively better than the Intel Xeon Processor E3110 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The FX-8320E was released over three years more recently than the Xeon Processor E3110, and so the FX-8320E is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Xeon Processor E3110 when running the latest games.

The FX-8320E has 6 more cores than the Xeon Processor E3110. With 8 cores, the FX-8320E is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The FX-8320E and Xeon Processor E3110 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the FX-8320E has a 0.2 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. As such, we need to look elsewhere for more reliable comparisons.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The FX-8320E has a 2048 KB bigger L2 cache than the Xeon Processor E3110, and although the Xeon Processor E3110 does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Xeon Processor E3110 has a 30 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the FX-8320E. However, the FX-8320E was created with a 13 nm smaller manufacturing technology. Overall, by taking both into account, the Xeon Processor E3110 is likely the CPU with the lower heat production and power requirements, but there really isn't much in it.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameVisheraWolfdale
MoBo SocketSocket AM3+LGA 775/ Socket T
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date01 Sep 201401 Jan 2008
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores8vs2
CPU Threads8vs-
Clock Speed3.2 GHzvs3 GHz
Turbo Frequency4 GHzvs-
Max TDP95 Wvs65 W
Lithography32 nmvs45 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size384 KBvs64 KB
L2 Cache Size8192 KBvs6144 KB
L3 Cache Size8 MBvs-
Memory Channels-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsno
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewFX-8320E is an energy efficient CPU based on the 32nm Piledriver architecture.

It offers 8 Physical Cores (8 Logical), initially clocked at 3.5GHz, which may go up to 4.0GHz and 8MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Turbo Core and Virtualization are activated and the clock multiplier is unlocked, meaning it can be overclocked easily.

The processor DOES NOT integrated any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 95W.

Its rank and specifications are still predicted.
Intel Xeon E3110 is a Server CPU part of the Xeon Series continuously released by Intel.