Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game APU A6-7400K Dual-Core Celeron G1820 2.7GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 197% 199%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 299% 303%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 188% 190%
Hitman 3 299% 303%
Grand Theft Auto VI 388% 392%
FIFA 21 177% 180%
Far Cry 6 368% 372%
Genshin Impact 125% 127%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 361% 366%
Watch Dogs Legion 299% 303%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD APU A6-7400K Dual-Core is marginally better than the Intel Celeron G1820 2.7GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The APU A6-7400K Dual-Core was released less than a year after the Celeron G1820 2.7GHz, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

The APU A6-7400K Dual-Core and the Celeron G1820 2.7GHz both have 2 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the APU A6-7400K Dual-Core and the Celeron G1820 2.7GHz may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

Both the AMD APU A6-7400K Dual-Core and the Intel Celeron G1820 2.7GHz have the same number of threads. Both CPUs have one thread per physical core.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The APU A6-7400K Dual-Core and Celeron G1820 2.7GHz are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the APU A6-7400K Dual-Core has a 0.8 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The APU A6-7400K Dual-Core has a 512 KB bigger L2 cache than the Celeron G1820 2.7GHz, and although the APU A6-7400K Dual-Core does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Celeron G1820 2.7GHz has a 12 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the APU A6-7400K Dual-Core, and was created with a 6 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Celeron G1820 2.7GHz will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

The APU A6-7400K Dual-Core has an on-board GPU, which means that it will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card. The Celeron G1820 2.7GHz, however, does not, and you will probably have to look for a dedicated card if you wish to use it at all.

For in-depth GPU comparisons with the Radeon R5 7400K, click on the following GPU overview comparison icon (visible throughout Game-Debate), and choose a GPU from the list to compare against:

On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameKaveriHaswell
MoBo SocketSocket FM2+LGA 1150
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date30 Jun 201401 Dec 2013
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs2
CPU Threads2vs2
Clock Speed3.5 GHzvs2.7 GHz
Turbo Frequency3.9 GHzvs-
Max TDP65 Wvs53 W
Lithography28 nmvs22 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs64 Bit
Max Temperature70°Cvs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs128 KB
L2 Cache Size1024 KBvs512 KB
L2 Cache Speed-vs-
L3 Cache Size-vs2 MB
Memory Channels-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

GraphicsRadeon R5 7400K
Base GPU Frequency756 MHzvs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX11.2vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewAPU A8-7400K Dual-Core is a performance CPU based on the 28nm, Steamroller architecture.

It offers 2 Physical Cores (2 Logical), initially clocked at 3.5GHz, which may go up to 3.9GHz and 1MB of L2 Cache.
Among its many features, Turbo Core and Virtualization are activated.

The processor integrates mildly powerful Graphics called Radeon R5 7400K, with 256 Shader Processing Units, clocked at 756MHz, which share the L2 Cache and system RAM with the processor.
Both the processor and integrated graphics have a rated board TDP of 65W.

It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications.
Celeron G1820 2.7GHz is a budget dual Core Processor based on the 22nm Haswell architecture.
It succeeds the Ivy Bridge Celeron G1620 Dual-Core 2.7GHz and against it, it remains within the same TDP and it offers superior CPU performance though the integrated graphics are still weak, very weak actually and doomed as soon as they star to run any 3D game.