Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Celeron N2920 1.86GHz Turion II Ultra Dual-Core Mobile M600
Cyberpunk 2077 471% 502%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 669% 711%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 454% 484%
FIFA 21 434% 463%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 547% 582%
Watch Dogs Legion 669% 711%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 788% 836%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 547% 582%
Grand Theft Auto VI 839% 890%
Genshin Impact 333% 356%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Celeron N2920 1.86GHz is marginally better than the AMD Turion II Ultra Dual-Core Mobile M600 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Celeron N2920 1.86GHz was released over three years more recently than the Turion II Ultra, and so the Celeron N2920 1.86GHz is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Turion II Ultra when running the latest games.

The Celeron N2920 1.86GHz has 2 more cores than the Turion II Ultra. With 4 cores, the Celeron N2920 1.86GHz is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Celeron N2920 1.86GHz and Turion II Ultra are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Turion II Ultra has a 0.54 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the Celeron N2920 1.86GHz.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Celeron N2920 1.86GHz and the Turion II Ultra have the same L2 cache size, and neither CPU appears to have an L3 cache. In this case, the Turion II Ultra has a 52 KB bigger L1 cache, so would probably provide better performance than the Celeron N2920 1.86GHz, at least in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Celeron N2920 1.86GHz has a 27 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Turion II Ultra, and was created with a 23 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Celeron N2920 1.86GHz will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameBay Trail-MCaspian
MoBo SocketBGA 1170Socket S1g3
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date03 Nov 201310 Sep 2009
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores4vs2
CPU Threads4vs-
Clock Speed1.86 GHzvs2.4 GHz
Turbo Frequency2 GHzvs-
Max TDP8 Wvs35 W
Lithography22 nmvs45 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs-
Max Temperature105°Cvs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size204 KBvs256 KB
L2 Cache Size2048 KBvs2048 KB
L3 Cache Size-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsnono

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewA power optimized processor for SoC notebooks. Very low power consumption, as well as very limited performance. Only very modest games will run optimally.Turion II Ultra (codenamed Caspian) is the mobile version of the K10.5 architecture produced using 45 nm fabrication process, also known by its desktop variant Regor. It is a dual core processor, and features clock speeds of 2.4 GHz to 2.7 GHz, 2 MB total L2 cache (1 MB per core), HyperTransport at 3.6 GT/s, and a 128 bit FPU. It maintains a TDP of 35W from its predecessor Turion X2 Ultra (codenamed Griffin).