Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Celeron N2810 2.0GHz Athlon Neo X2 Dual Core L325
Cyberpunk 2077 981% 1019%
Hitman 3 1355% 1406%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1355% 1406%
The Medium 1755% 1819%
Resident Evil 8 1100% 1142%
FIFA 21 911% 946%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 948% 984%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1677% 1739%
Genshin Impact 718% 747%
Far Cry 6 1605% 1665%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Celeron N2810 2.0GHz is marginally better than the AMD Athlon Neo X2 Dual Core L325 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Celeron N2810 2.0GHz was released over three years more recently than the Athlon Neo X2, and so the Celeron N2810 2.0GHz is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Athlon Neo X2 when running the latest games.

The Celeron N2810 2.0GHz and the Athlon Neo X2 both have 2 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Celeron N2810 2.0GHz and the Athlon Neo X2 may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Celeron N2810 2.0GHz and Athlon Neo X2 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Celeron N2810 2.0GHz has a 0.5 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Celeron N2810 2.0GHz and the Athlon Neo X2 have the same L2 cache size, and neither CPU appears to have an L3 cache. In this case, the Athlon Neo X2 has a 154 KB bigger L1 cache, so would probably provide better performance than the Celeron N2810 2.0GHz, at least in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Celeron N2810 2.0GHz has a 10 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Athlon Neo X2, and was created with a 43 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Celeron N2810 2.0GHz will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameBay Trail-MConesus
MoBo SocketBGA 1170Socket 812
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date11 Sep 201301 Jun 2009
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs2
CPU Threads2vs-
Clock Speed2 GHzvs1.5 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP8 Wvs18 W
Lithography22 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs-
Max Temperature100°Cvs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size102 KBvs256 KB
L2 Cache Size1024 KBvs1024 KB
L3 Cache Size-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsnono

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewA power optimized processor for SoC notebooks. Very low power consumption, as well as very limited performance. Only very modest games will run optimally.With 27 mm 27 mm in size and 2.5 mm in thickness, the Athlon Neo processors utilize a new package called "ASB1", essentially a BGA package, for smaller footprint to allow smaller designs for notebooks and lowering the cost. The clock of the processors is significantly lower than desktop and other mobile counterparts to reach a low TDP, at 15W maximum for a single core x86-64 CPU at 1.6 GHz. The Athlon Neo processors are equipped with 512 KB of L2 cache and HyperTransport 1.0 running at 800 MHz frequency.