9.8
Check Prices $2057
3.3
Check Prices $195
Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Xeon E5-2690 v2 FX-8350
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 4% 64%
Doom Eternal 16% 45%
Half-Life: Alyx 24% 30%
Cyberpunk 2077 40% 3%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3% 77%
Resident Evil 3 Remake 34% 14%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 24% 30%
One Piece: Pirate Warriors 4 31% 19%
Ori and the Will of the Wisps 44% 3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Remastered 86% 76%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 is massively better than the AMD FX-8350 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Xeon E5-2690 v2 was released less than a year after the FX-8350, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).

The Xeon E5-2690 v2 has 2 more cores than the FX-8350. 10 cores is probably excessive if you mean to just run the latest games, as games are not yet able to harness this many cores. The cores in the FX-8350 is more than enough for gaming purposes. However, if you intend on running a server with the Xeon E5-2690 v2, it would seem to be a decent choice.

The Xeon E5-2690 v2 has 12 more threads than the FX-8350. The FX-8350 has one thread per physical core, whereas the Xeon E5-2690 v2 uses hyperthreading and has 2 logical threads per physical core.

Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Xeon E5-2690 v2 and FX-8350 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the FX-8350 has a 1 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the Xeon E5-2690 v2 is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The FX-8350 has a 7936 KB bigger L2 cache than the Xeon E5-2690 v2, but on the other hand, it is the Xeon E5-2690 v2 that has a 17 MB bigger L3 cache than the FX-8350. In this case, the L2 size is probably what counts, so the FX-8350 is likely superior in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The FX-8350 has a 5 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Xeon E5-2690 v2. However, the Xeon E5-2690 v2 was created with a 10 nm smaller manufacturing technology. Overall, by taking both into account, the Xeon E5-2690 v2 is likely the CPU with the lower heat production and power requirements, by a small amount.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameIvy BridgeVishera
MoBo SocketLGA 2011/Socket RSocket AM3+
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date10 Sep 201323 Oct 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores10vs8
CPU Threads20vs8
Clock Speed3 GHzvs4 GHz
Turbo Frequency3.6 GHzvs4.2 GHz
Max TDP130 Wvs125 W
Lithography22 nmvs32 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs64 Bit
Max Temperature88°Cvs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size-vs384 KB
L2 Cache Size256 KBvs8192 KB
L3 Cache Size25 MBvs8 MB
Memory Channels-vs2
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsno
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size52.5mm x 45mmvs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Xeon E5-2690 v2 is an extremely high performance 64-bit 10-core processor with a clock speed of 3.0GHz.
It's based on the Ivy Bridge architecture and the memory controller supports DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600 and DDR3-1866.
FX-8350 is a high-end CPU based on the 32nm Piledriver architecture.

It offers 8 Physical Cores (8 Logical), initially clocked at 4.0GHz, which may go up to 4.2GHz and 8MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Turbo Core and Virtualization are activated and the clock multiplier is unlocked, meaning it can be overclocked easily.

The processor DOES NOT integrated any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 125W.

Compared to its competitor Core i7-3770K it performs around 12% worse. Still, its performance is very good and sufficient for extreme gaming.