Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game FX-9590 Opteron 4386
Cyberpunk 2077 28% 30%
Hitman 3 3% 74%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 3% 74%
The Medium 24% 122%
Resident Evil 8 20% 44%
FIFA 21 32% 21%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 30% 26%
Grand Theft Auto VI 19% 113%
Genshin Impact 45% 2%
Far Cry 6 14% 104%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD FX-9590 is massively better than the AMD Opteron 4386 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The FX-9590 was released less than a year after the Opteron 4386, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).

The FX-9590 and the Opteron 4386 both have 8 cores. Games are not yet able to harness this many cores, so it is probably excessive if you mean to just run the latest games; however, if you intend on running a server with this CPU, it would seem to be a decent choice.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The FX-9590 and the Opteron 4386 are from the same family of CPUs, and thus their clock speeds are directly comparable. With this in mind, it is safe to say that with a 1.6 GHz faster base clock rate, the FX-9590 manages to provide massively better performance than the Opteron 4386.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Opteron 4386 has a 125 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the FX-9590 (though they were created with the same size 0 nm manufacturing technology). What this means is the Opteron 4386 will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU Codename--
MoBo SocketSocket AM3+Socket C32
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date11 Jun 201314 Dec 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores8vs8
CPU Threads8vs-
Clock Speed4.7 GHzvs3.1 GHz
Turbo Frequency5 GHzvs-
System Bus -vs6400 MHz
Max TDP220 Wvs95 W
Lithography-vs-
Bit Width64 Bitvs-
Max Temperature-vs70°C
Virtualization Technologynovsyes
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size-vs-
L1 Cache Count-vs8
L2 Cache Size-vs-
L2 Cache Count-vs8
L2 Cache Speed-vs3100 MHz
L3 Cache Size8 MBvs8192 MB
Memory Channels-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewFX-9590 is a high-end CPU based on the 32nm Piledriver architecture.

It offers 8 Physical Cores (8 Logical), initially clocked at 4.7GHz, which may go up to 5.0GHz and 8MB of L3 Cache.
Among its many features, Turbo Core and Virtualization are activated and the clock multiplier is unlocked, meaning it can be overclocked easily.

The processor DOES NOT have any integrated graphics, and has a rated board TDP of 220W.

Compared to its predecessor FX-8350 there's an overall 12% performance boost. Its performance is exceptionally good and enough for even the most demanding applications.
Opteron is AMD's x86 server and workstation processor line, and was the first processor to implement the AMD64 instruction set architecture (known generically as x86-64). It was released on April 22, 2003 with the SledgeHammer core (K8) and was intended to compete in the server and workstation markets, particularly in the same segment as the Intel Xeon processor. Processors based on the AMD K10 microarchitecture (codenamed Barcelona) were announced on September 10, 2007 featuring a new quad-core configuration. The most-recently released Opteron CPUs are the 8- and 12-core Socket G34 Opterons, code-named Magny-Cours.

Vendor-Specific Features

AMD Power ManagementAMD Power Management
AMDBusiness ClassAMD Business Class
AMD Black EditionAMD Black Edition