Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Opteron 8376 HE Core 2 Quad Q9400 2.66GHz
Halo: Reach 57% 2%
Cyberpunk 2077 223% 101%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 187% 79%
Red Dead Redemption 2 280% 136%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 181% 75%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 313% 157%
Doom Eternal 212% 94%
Grand Theft Auto VI 416% 221%
FIFA 20 172% 69%
Need For Speed Heat 221% 100%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 2.66GHz is massively better than the AMD Opteron 8376 HE when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Opteron 8376 HE was released less than a year after the Core 2 Quad, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

The Opteron 8376 HE and the Core 2 Quad both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Opteron 8376 HE and Core 2 Quad are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core 2 Quad has a 0.36 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the .

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Core 2 Quad has a 5632 KB bigger L2 cache than the Opteron 8376 HE, and although the Core 2 Quad does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Opteron 8376 HE has a 40 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Core 2 Quad (though they were created with the same size 45 nm manufacturing technology). What this means is the Opteron 8376 HE will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameShanghaiYorkfield
MoBo SocketSocket Fr2LGA 775/ Socket T
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date29 Jan 200910 Aug 2008
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores4vs4
CPU Threads-vs4
Clock Speed2.3 GHzvs2.66 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
System Bus 1000 MHzvs-
Max TDP55 Wvs95 W
Lithography45 nmvs45 nm
Bit Width-vs64 Bit
Voltage Range1.2V KBvs-
Max Temperature55°Cvs71°C
Virtualization Technologyyesvsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs256 KB
L1 Cache Count4vs-
L2 Cache Size512 KBvs6144 KB
L2 Cache Count4vs-
L2 Cache Speed2300 MHzvs-
L3 Cache Size6144 MBvs-
Memory Channels-vs2
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOpteron is AMD's x86 server and workstation processor line, and was the first processor which supported the AMD64 instruction set architecture (known generically as x86-64). It was released on April 22, 2003 with the SledgeHammer core (K8) and was intended to compete in the server and workstation markets, particularly in the same segment as the Intel Xeon processor. Processors based on the AMD K10 microarchitecture (codenamed Barcelona) were announced on September 10, 2007 featuring a new quad-core configuration. The most-recently released Opteron CPUs are the Piledriver-based Opteron 4300 and 6300 series processors, codenamed "Seoul" and "Abu Dhabi" respectively.Core 2 Quad Q9400 2.66GHz is a high-end Processor based on the 45nm Core micro-architecture.

It offers 4 Physical Cores (4 Logical), clocked at 2.66GHz and 6MB of L2 Cache.
Among its many features, Virtualization is activated.

The processor DOES NOT integrate any graphics. and has a rated board TDP of 95W.

It offers average performance. It will therefore become a bottleneck in today's demanding games.

Vendor-Specific Features

AMD Power ManagementIntel Quick Sync Video
AMDBusiness ClassIntel InTru 3D
AMD Black EditionIntel Insider
Intel Wireless Display
Intel Flexible Display
Intel Clear Video HD
Intel vPro
Intel Hyper-Threading
Intel Virt. Tech. for Directed I/O
Intel Trusted Execution
AES New Instructions
Intel Anti-Theft
Idle States
Intel SpeedStep
Thermal Monitoring
Execute Disable Bit
Intel VT-x with EPT
Embedded Options

Title

Body