Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Opteron 8382 Opteron 8380
Cyberpunk 2077 157% 169%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 246% 262%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 149% 160%
Watch Dogs Legion 246% 262%
Godfall 397% 419%
FIFA 21 141% 151%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 191% 204%
Grand Theft Auto VI 323% 342%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 300% 318%
Genshin Impact 95% 104%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Opteron 8382 is marginally better than the AMD Opteron 8380 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

Both the Opteron 8382 and the Opteron 8380 were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.

The Opteron 8382 and the Opteron 8380 both have 4 cores, which is not likely to be a limiting factor for gaming.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Opteron 8382 and the Opteron 8380 are from the same family of CPUs, and thus their clock speeds are directly comparable. With this in mind, it is safe to say that with a 0.1 GHz faster base clock rate, the Opteron 8382 manages to provide marginally better performance than the Opteron 8380.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Opteron 8382 and the Opteron 8380 have the same L2 cache size, and the same L3 cache size, so in terms of cache-related gaming performance, we have to look back to the clock rate, where the Opteron 8382 wins out.

The System Bus Speed is important for providing higher bandwidth, and with higher bandwidth the system has the capacity to move more data over a certain time period than it would with lower bandwidth.

The Opteron 8382 and the Opteron 8380 both have System Bus Speeds of 1000 MHz, and so have the same limits when it comes to the size of the data being processed at once.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

Both the Opteron 8382 and the Opteron 8380 have the same TDP of 75 Watts, and were created with the same manufacturing size of 45 nm, which means they will affect your yearly electricity bill about equally.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameShanghaiShanghai
MoBo SocketSocket Fr2Socket Fr2
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date13 Nov 200813 Nov 2008
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores4vs4
Clock Speed2.6 GHzvs2.5 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
System Bus 1000 MHzvs1000 MHz
Max TDP75 Wvs75 W
Lithography45 nmvs45 nm
Bit Width-vs-
Voltage Range1.35 V KBvs1.35 V KB
Max Temperature55°Cvs55°C
Virtualization Technologyyesvsyes
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs128 KB
L1 Cache Count4vs4
L2 Cache Size512 KBvs512 KB
L2 Cache Count4vs4
L2 Cache Speed2600 MHzvs2500 MHz
L3 Cache Size6144 MBvs6144 MB
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphics
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOpteron is AMD's x86 server and workstation processor line, and was the first processor which supported the AMD64 instruction set architecture (known generically as x86-64). It was released on April 22, 2003 with the SledgeHammer core (K8) and was intended to compete in the server and workstation markets, particularly in the same segment as the Intel Xeon processor. Processors based on the AMD K10 microarchitecture (codenamed Barcelona) were announced on September 10, 2007 featuring a new quad-core configuration. The most-recently released Opteron CPUs are the Piledriver-based Opteron 4300 and 6300 series processors, codenamed "Seoul" and "Abu Dhabi" respectively.Opteron is AMD's x86 server and workstation processor line, and was the first processor which supported the AMD64 instruction set architecture (known generically as x86-64). It was released on April 22, 2003 with the SledgeHammer core (K8) and was intended to compete in the server and workstation markets, particularly in the same segment as the Intel Xeon processor. Processors based on the AMD K10 microarchitecture (codenamed Barcelona) were announced on September 10, 2007 featuring a new quad-core configuration. The most-recently released Opteron CPUs are the Piledriver-based Opteron 4300 and 6300 series processors, codenamed "Seoul" and "Abu Dhabi" respectively.

Vendor-Specific Features

AMD Power ManagementAMD Power Management
AMDBusiness ClassAMD Business Class
AMD Black EditionAMD Black Edition