Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Opteron 8378 | APU A6-5400B Dual-Core |
Hitman 3 | 273% | 341% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 177% | 228% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 273% | 341% |
Resident Evil 8 | 208% | 264% |
FIFA 21 | 159% | 206% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 355% | 438% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 168% | 217% |
Genshin Impact | 110% | 148% |
Far Cry 6 | 337% | 417% |
The Medium | 375% | 462% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Opteron 8378 is noticeably better than the AMD APU A6-5400B Dual-Core when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.
The APU A6-5400B Dual-Core was released less than a year after the Opteron 8378, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.
The Opteron 8378 has 2 more cores than the APU A6-5400B Dual-Core. With 4 cores, the Opteron 8378 is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them.
More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.
The Opteron 8378 and APU A6-5400B Dual-Core are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the APU A6-5400B Dual-Core has a 1.2 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the Opteron 8378 is superior.
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.
The APU A6-5400B Dual-Core has a 512 KB bigger L2 cache than the Opteron 8378, and although the APU A6-5400B Dual-Core does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.
The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.
The APU A6-5400B Dual-Core has a 10 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Opteron 8378, and was created with a 13 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the APU A6-5400B Dual-Core will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).
The APU A6-5400B Dual-Core has an on-board GPU, which means that it will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card. The Opteron 8378, however, does not, and you will probably have to look for a dedicated card if you wish to use it at all.
For in-depth GPU comparisons with the Radeon HD 7540D, click on the following GPU overview comparison icon (visible throughout Game-Debate), and choose a GPU from the list to compare against:
On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.
CPU Codename | Shanghai | Trinity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MoBo Socket | Socket Fr2 | Socket FM2 | |||
Notebook CPU | no | no | |||
Release Date | 13 Nov 2008 | 01 Oct 2012 | |||
CPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() |
CPU Cores | 4 | ![]() | vs | 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPU Threads | - | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | ![]() | 3.6 GHz | |
Turbo Frequency | - | vs | ![]() | 3.8 GHz | |
System Bus | 1000 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Max TDP | 75 W | vs | ![]() | 65 W | |
Lithography | 45 nm | vs | ![]() | 32 nm | |
Bit Width | - | vs | ![]() | 64 Bit | |
Voltage Range | 1.35 V KB | ![]() | vs | - | |
Max Temperature | 55°C | vs | ![]() | 70°C | |
Virtualization Technology | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Comparison |
L1 Cache Size | 128 KB | ![]() | vs | 96 KB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache Count | 4 | ![]() | vs | 3 | |
L2 Cache Size | 512 KB | vs | ![]() | 1024 KB | |
L2 Cache Count | 4 | ![]() | vs | 2 | |
L2 Cache Speed | 2400 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
L3 Cache Size | 6144 MB | ![]() | vs | - | |
Memory Channels | - | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
ECC Memory Support | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
Graphics | ![]() | Radeon HD 7540D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base GPU Frequency | - | vs | ![]() | 760 MHz | |
Max GPU Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
DirectX | - | vs | ![]() | 11 | |
Displays Supported | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Package Size | - | vs | - | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Configurations | - | vs | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Opteron is AMD's x86 server and workstation processor line, and was the first processor which supported the AMD64 instruction set architecture (known generically as x86-64). It was released on April 22, 2003 with the SledgeHammer core (K8) and was intended to compete in the server and workstation markets, particularly in the same segment as the Intel Xeon processor. Processors based on the AMD K10 microarchitecture (codenamed Barcelona) were announced on September 10, 2007 featuring a new quad-core configuration. The most-recently released Opteron CPUs are the Piledriver-based Opteron 4300 and 6300 series processors, codenamed "Seoul" and "Abu Dhabi" respectively. | APU A6-5400B Dual-Core is a performance CPU based on the 32nm, Piledriver architecture. It offers 2 Physical Cores (2 Logical), initially clocked at 3.6GHz, which may go up to 3.8GHz and 1MB of L2 Cache. Among its many features, Turbo Core and Virtualization are activated. The processor integrates weak Graphics called Radeon HD 7540D, with 192 Shader Processing Units, clocked at 760MHz, which share the L2 Cache and system RAM with the processor. Both the processor and integrated graphics have a rated board TDP of 65W. It offers average performance. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications. |
---|
AMD Power Management | ![]() | ![]() | AMD Power Management | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDBusiness Class | ![]() | ![]() | AMD Business Class | |||
AMD Black Edition | ![]() | ![]() | AMD Black Edition |