Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Celeron M ULV 800MHz | Pentium 4 Mobile 2.8GHz |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6332% | 2503% |
Hitman 3 | 8559% | 3404% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 8559% | 3404% |
Resident Evil 8 | 7043% | 2790% |
FIFA 21 | 5916% | 2334% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 10471% | 4177% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 6133% | 2422% |
Genshin Impact | 4770% | 1871% |
The Medium | 10936% | 4365% |
Far Cry 6 | 10047% | 4006% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Pentium 4 Mobile 2.8GHz is very slightly better than the Intel Celeron M ULV 800MHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.
Both the Celeron M ULV 800MHz and the Pentium 4 Mobile 2.8GHz were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.
Both CPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful CPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.
The Celeron M ULV and the Pentium 4 Mobile both have 1 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Celeron M ULV and the Pentium 4 Mobile may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.
More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.
The Celeron M ULV and Pentium 4 Mobile are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Pentium 4 Mobile has a 2 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the is superior.
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.
The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.
The Celeron M ULV has a 81 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Pentium 4 Mobile, and was created with a 90 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Celeron M ULV will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).
CPU Codename | - | Prescott | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MoBo Socket | Socket 956 | Socket 478/Socket N | |||
Notebook CPU | yes | yes | |||
Release Date | 01 Jun 2004 | 01 Jun 2004 | |||
CPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() |
CPU Cores | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clock Speed | 0.8 GHz | vs | ![]() | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
System Bus | 400 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Max TDP | 7 W | ![]() | vs | 88 W | |
Lithography | - | vs | 90 nm | ||
Bit Width | 32 Bit | ![]() | vs | - | |
Voltage Range | 1.004V KB | ![]() | vs | - | |
Max Temperature | 100°C | ![]() | vs | - | |
Virtualization Technology | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
L1 Cache Size | - | vs | ![]() | 16 KB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L2 Cache Size | - | vs | ![]() | 1024 KB | |
L2 Cache Speed | - | vs | - | ||
L3 Cache Size | - | vs | - | ||
ECC Memory Support | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
Graphics | no | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base GPU Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
Max GPU Frequency | - | vs | - | ||
DirectX | - | vs | - | ||
Displays Supported | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | vs | - | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Revision | - | vs | - | ||
PCIe Configurations | - | vs | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | The Celeron brand has been used by Intel for several distinct ranges of x86 CPUs targeted at budget personal computers. Celeron processors can run all IA-32 computer programs, but their performance is somewhat lower when compared to similar CPUs with higher-priced Intel CPU brands. For example, the Celeron brand will often have less cache memory, or have advanced features purposely disabled. These missing features have had a variable impact on performance. In some cases, the effect was significant and in other cases the differences were relatively minor. Many of the Celeron designs have achieved a very high bang for the buck, while at other times, the performance difference has been noticeable. This has been the primary justification for the higher cost of other Intel CPU brands versus the Celeron range. | The Mobile Intel Pentium 4 Processor was released to address the problem of putting a full desktop Pentium 4 processor into a laptop, which some manufacturers were doing. The Mobile Pentium 4 used a 533 MHz FSB, following the desktop Pentium 4's evolution. Oddly, increasing the bus speed by 133 MHz (33 MHz core) caused a massive increase in TDPs, as mobile Pentium 4 processors gave off 59.8 W - 70 W of heat, with the Hyper-Threading variants giving off 66.1 W - 88 W. This allowed the mobile Pentium 4 to bridge the gap between the desktop Pentium 4 (giving off 115 W maximum), and the Pentium 4-M (giving off 35 W maximum). |
---|