Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game APU Z-60 Celeron M 575 2.0GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 1686% 1732%
Minecraft: Dungeons 1686% 1732%
Call of Duty Warzone 1458% 1498%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2952% 3030%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 2150% 2208%
Valorant 976% 1004%
Maneater 1686% 1732%
Phantasy Star Online 2 278% 288%
Doom Eternal 2400% 2464%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 2730% 2803%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD APU Z-60 is marginally better than the Intel Celeron M 575 2.0GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The APU Z-60 was released over three years more recently than the Celeron M 575, and so the APU Z-60 is likely to have far better levels of support, and will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Celeron M 575 when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful CPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The APU Z-60 has 1 more core than the Celeron M 575. However, while the APU Z-60 will probably perform better than the Celeron M 575, both CPUs are likely to struggle with the latest games, and will almost certainly bottleneck high-end graphics cards. Both CPUs also have quite low clock frequencies, which means recent games will have to be played at low settings, assuming you own an equivalently powerful GPU.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The APU Z-60 and Celeron M 575 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Celeron M 575 has a 1 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is probably a good indicator that the APU Z-60 is superior.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The APU Z-60 and the Celeron M 575 have the same L2 cache size, and neither CPU appears to have an L3 cache. In this case, the Celeron M 575 has a 60 KB bigger L1 cache, so would probably provide better performance than the APU Z-60, at least in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The APU Z-60 has a 26 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Celeron M 575, and was created with a 25 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the APU Z-60 will consume significantly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill significantly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

The APU Z-60 has an on-board GPU, which means that it will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card. The Celeron M 575, however, does not, and you will probably have to look for a dedicated card if you wish to use it at all.

For in-depth GPU comparisons with the Radeon HD 6250, click on the following GPU overview comparison icon (visible throughout Game-Debate), and choose a GPU from the list to compare against:

On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameHondoMerom
MoBo SocketBGA413Socket P
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date09 Oct 201219 Aug 2008
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs1
CPU Threads2vs-
Clock Speed1 GHzvs2 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP5 Wvs31 W
Lithography40 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width64 Bitvs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size4 KBvs64 KB
L1 Cache Count127vs-
L2 Cache Size1024 KBvs1024 KB
L2 Cache Count2vs-
L2 Cache Speed-vs-
L3 Cache Size-vs-
Memory Channels-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

GraphicsRadeon HD 6250no
Base GPU Frequency280 MHzvs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX11vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewAPU Z-60 is a very tiny CPU for HD Tablets released by AMD in 2012.
It features a Radeon HD 6250 clocked at 275 MHZ with DirectX 11 support which uses system memory.
The performance is very limited and not recommended for gaming but more than enough for all the HD Tablets features.
Merom is the code name for various Intel processors that are sold as Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Solo, Pentium Dual-Core and Celeron. It was the first mobile processor to be based on the Core microarchitecture, replacing the Enhanced Pentium M based Yonah processor. Merom has product code 80537, which is shared with Merom-2M and Merom-L that are very similar but have a smaller L2 cache. Merom-L has only one processor core and a different CPUID model. The desktop version of Merom is Conroe and the dual-socket server version is Woodcrest. Merom has subsequently been replaced by Penryn.