Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Core i3-2365M 1.4GHz Celeron Dual-Core 867 1.3GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 418% 608%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 597% 854%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 401% 587%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 486% 703%
FIFA 21 384% 563%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 456% 662%
Genshin Impact 292% 436%
Grand Theft Auto VI 751% 1064%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 705% 1001%
Watch Dogs Legion 597% 854%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core i3-2365M 1.4GHz is noticeably better than the Intel Celeron Dual-Core 867 1.3GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Core i3-2365M 1.4GHz was released less than a year after the Celeron Dual-Core 867, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

The Core i3-2365M 1.4GHz and the Celeron Dual-Core 867 both have 2 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Core i3-2365M 1.4GHz and the Celeron Dual-Core 867 may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Core i3-2365M 1.4GHz and the Celeron Dual-Core 867 are from the same family of CPUs, and thus their clock speeds are directly comparable. With this in mind, it is safe to say that with a 0.1 GHz faster base clock rate, the Core i3-2365M 1.4GHz manages to provide marginally better performance than the Celeron Dual-Core 867.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Core i3-2365M 1.4GHz and the Celeron Dual-Core 867 have the same L2 cache size, but the Core i3-2365M 1.4GHz has a 1 MB bigger L3 cache, so in this area, it wins out over the Celeron Dual-Core 867.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

Both the Core i3-2365M 1.4GHz and the Celeron Dual-Core 867 have the same TDP of 17 Watts, and were created with the same manufacturing size of 32 nm, which means they will affect your yearly electricity bill about equally.

The Core i3-2365M 1.4GHz has an on-board GPU, which means that it will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card. The Celeron Dual-Core 867, however, does not, and you will probably have to look for a dedicated card if you wish to use it at all.

For in-depth GPU comparisons with the Intel HD Graphics 3000 Mobile, click on the following GPU overview comparison icon (visible throughout Game-Debate), and choose a GPU from the list to compare against:

On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
MoBo SocketrPGA 988A / B / Socket G1 / G2BGA 1023
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date01 Aug 201201 Jan 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs2
Clock Speed1.4 GHzvs1.3 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP17 Wvs17 W
Lithography32 nmvs32 nm
Bit Width-vs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs128 KB
L2 Cache Size512 KBvs512 KB
L3 Cache Size3 MBvs2 MB
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 3000 Mobileno
Base GPU Frequency350 MHzvs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX10.1vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewCore i3-2365M 1.4GHz is an ULV mobile processor based on the 32nm Sandy Bridge architecture with most of the Sandy Bridge features activated - not Turbo Boost, for example, that's optimized for low power consumption.
It features 2 Cores (4 Threads), clocked at 1.4GHz and integrated graphics called Intel HD 3000 which run at 350MHz (1000 MHz in Turbo mode). The CPU supports DDR3-1066 and DDR3-133 memory types. Expect a TDP of up to 17 Watt.
Its gaming performance is below the average, considering today's standards and so it should only be paired with middle to fast-middle-class GPUs such as GeForce GT 540M/GeForce GT 630M & Radeon HD 6650M/7650M. Its graphics performance is also substancialy lower.
Sandy Bridge is the codename for a microarchitecture developed by Intel beginning in 2005 for central processing units in computers to replace the Nehalem microarchitecture. Intel demonstrated a Sandy Bridge processor in 2009, and released first products based on the architecture in January 2011 under the Core brand.