Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Duron 1.8GHz Sempron 2600+
Cyberpunk 2077 2596% 2107%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 3530% 2871%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 2513% 2039%
FIFA 21 2422% 1964%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2954% 2400%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 2798% 2273%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 4092% 3331%
Watch Dogs Legion 3530% 2871%
Genshin Impact 1941% 1571%
Grand Theft Auto VI 4331% 3527%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD Sempron 2600+ is marginally better than the AMD Duron 1.8GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Sempron 2600+ was released less than a year after the Duron 1.8GHz, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

Both CPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful CPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Duron 1.8GHz and the Sempron 2600+ both have 1 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Duron 1.8GHz and the Sempron 2600+ may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Duron 1.8GHz and Sempron 2600+ are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Sempron 2600+ has a 0.033 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. As such, we need to look elsewhere for more reliable comparisons.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Sempron 2600+ has a 192 KB bigger L2 cache than the Duron 1.8GHz, but neither of the CPUs have L3 caches, so the Sempron 2600+ wins out in this area with its larger L2 cache.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Duron 1.8GHz has a 5 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Sempron 2600+ (though they were created with the same size 130 nm manufacturing technology). What this means is the Duron 1.8GHz will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameApplebred (Model 8)Thoroughbred (Model 8)
MoBo SocketSocket 462/Socket ASocket 462/Socket A
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date21 Aug 200328 Jul 2004
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores1vs1
Clock Speed1.8 GHzvs1.833 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP57 Wvs62 W
Lithography130 nmvs130 nm
Bit Width-vs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs128 KB
L2 Cache Size64 KBvs256 KB
L3 Cache Size-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsnono

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe AMD Duron is a x86-compatible microprocessor that was manufactured by AMD. It was released on June 19, 2000 as a low-cost alternative to AMD's own Athlon processor and the Pentium III and Celeron processor lines from rival Intel. The Duron was discontinued in 2004 and succeeded by the Sempron.Sempron has been the marketing name used by AMD for several different budget desktop CPUs, using several different technologies and CPU socket formats. The Sempron replaced the AMD Duron processor and competes against Intel's Celeron series of processors. AMD coined the name from the Latin semper, which means always, to suggest the Sempron is suitable for daily use, practical, and part of everyday life.