Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Sempron X2 180 Celeron G465 1.9GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 664% 654%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 928% 914%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 640% 630%
FIFA 21 614% 605%
Watch Dogs Legion 928% 914%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 765% 754%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1087% 1072%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1155% 1138%
Godfall 1375% 1355%
Genshin Impact 478% 471%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Celeron G465 1.9GHz is marginally better than the AMD Sempron X2 180 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Celeron G465 1.9GHz was released less than a year after the Sempron X2 180, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

The Sempron X2 180 has 1 more core than the Celeron G465 1.9GHz. However, while the Sempron X2 180 will probably perform better than the Celeron G465 1.9GHz, both CPUs are likely to struggle with the latest games, and will almost certainly bottleneck high-end graphics cards. Both CPUs also have quite low clock frequencies, which means recent games will have to be played at low settings, assuming you own an equivalently powerful GPU.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Sempron X2 180 and Celeron G465 1.9GHz are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Sempron X2 180 has a 0.5 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. In this case, however, the difference is enough that it possibly indicates the superiority of the Sempron X2 180.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Sempron X2 180 has a 768 KB bigger L2 cache than the Celeron G465 1.9GHz, and although the Sempron X2 180 does not appear to have an L3 cache, its larger L2 cache means that it wins out in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Celeron G465 1.9GHz has a 10 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Sempron X2 180, and was created with a 13 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Celeron G465 1.9GHz will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameRegorSandy Bridge
MoBo SocketSocket AM2+ / AM3LGA 1155/Socket H2
Notebook CPUnono
Release Date01 Jul 201002 Sep 2012
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs1
Clock Speed2.4 GHzvs1.9 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP45 Wvs35 W
Lithography45 nmvs32 nm
Bit Width-vs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size256 KBvs64 KB
L2 Cache Size1024 KBvs256 KB
L2 Cache Speed-vs-
L3 Cache Size-vs1.5 MB
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsno
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewSempron has been the marketing name used by AMD for several different budget desktop CPUs, using several different technologies and CPU socket formats. The Sempron replaced the AMD Duron processor and competes against Intel's Celeron series of processors. AMD coined the name from the Latin semper, which means "always", to suggest the Sempron is suitable for "daily use, practical, and part of everyday life".Sandy Bridge is the codename for a microarchitecture developed by Intel beginning in 2005 for central processing units in computers to replace the Nehalem microarchitecture. Intel demonstrated a Sandy Bridge processor in 2009, and released first products based on the architecture in January 2011 under the Core brand.