Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Celeron M 575 2.0GHz Atom D525 1.83GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 1732% 1192%
Call of Duty Warzone 1498% 1027%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3030% 2108%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 2208% 1528%
Maneater 1732% 1192%
Valorant 1004% 679%
Saints Row 3 Remastered 2199% 1521%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 2803% 1948%
Doom Eternal 2464% 1709%
Mafia 2: Definitive Edition 1673% 1151%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Atom D525 1.83GHz is very slightly better than the Intel Celeron M 575 2.0GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Atom D525 1.83GHz was released less than a year after the Celeron M 575, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

The Atom D525 1.83GHz has 1 more core than the Celeron M 575. However, while the Atom D525 1.83GHz will probably perform better than the Celeron M 575, both CPUs are likely to struggle with the latest games, and will almost certainly bottleneck high-end graphics cards. Both CPUs also have quite low clock frequencies, which means recent games will have to be played at low settings, assuming you own an equivalently powerful GPU.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Celeron M 575 and Atom D525 1.83GHz are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Celeron M 575 has a 0.2 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. As such, we need to look elsewhere for more reliable comparisons.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Celeron M 575 and the Atom D525 1.83GHz have the same L2 cache size, and neither CPU appears to have an L3 cache. In this case, the Atom D525 1.83GHz has a 48 KB bigger L1 cache, so would probably provide better performance than the Celeron M 575, at least in this area.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

The Atom D525 1.83GHz has a 18 Watt lower Maximum TDP than the Celeron M 575, and was created with a 20 nm smaller manufacturing technology. What this means is the Atom D525 1.83GHz will consume slightly less power and consequently produce less heat, enabling more prolonged computational tasks with fewer adverse effects. This will lower your yearly electricity bill slightly, as well as prevent you from having to invest in extra cooling mechanisms (unless you overclock).

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameMeromPineview
MoBo SocketSocket PSocket 559
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date19 Aug 200801 Apr 2010
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores1vs2
CPU Threads-vs4
Clock Speed2 GHzvs1.8 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP31 Wvs13 W
Lithography65 nmvs45 nm
Bit Width-vs64 Bit
Voltage Range-vs0.800V-1.175V KB
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size64 KBvs112 KB
L2 Cache Size1024 KBvs1024 KB
L2 Cache Speed-vs-
L3 Cache Size-vs-
Max Memory Size-vs4 GB
Max Memory Bandwidth-vs6.4 GB/s
Memory Channels-vs1
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsno
Base GPU Frequency-vs-
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs-
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs22mm x 22mm
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewMerom is the code name for various Intel processors that are sold as Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Solo, Pentium Dual-Core and Celeron. It was the first mobile processor to be based on the Core microarchitecture, replacing the Enhanced Pentium M based Yonah processor. Merom has product code 80537, which is shared with Merom-2M and Merom-L that are very similar but have a smaller L2 cache. Merom-L has only one processor core and a different CPUID model. The desktop version of Merom is Conroe and the dual-socket server version is Woodcrest. Merom has subsequently been replaced by Penryn.Intel Atom is the brand name for a line of ultra-low-voltage x86 and x86-64 CPUs (or microprocessors) from Intel, designed in 45 nm CMOS and used mainly in netbooks, nettops, and Mobile Internet devices (MIDs)
Intel Atom is a direct successor of the Intel A100 and A110 low-power microprocessors (code-named Stealey), which were built on a 90 nm process, had 512 KB L2 cache and run at 600 MHz/800 MHz with 3W TDP (Thermal Design Power). Prior to the Silverthorne announcement, outside sources had speculated that Atom would compete with AMD's Geode system-on-a-chip processors, used by the One Laptop per Child project, and other cost- and power-sensitive applications for x86 processors. However, Intel revealed on October 15, 2007 that it was developing another new mobile processor, codenamed Diamondville, for OLPC-type devices.