Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Celeron Dual-Core 867 1.3GHz Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 608% 430%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 854% 613%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 587% 413%
FIFA 21 563% 395%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 703% 500%
Watch Dogs Legion 854% 613%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1001% 724%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1064% 771%
Genshin Impact 436% 301%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 703% 500%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz is noticeably better than the Intel Celeron Dual-Core 867 1.3GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

The Celeron Dual-Core 867 was released less than a year after the Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz, and so they are likely to have similar levels of support, and similarly optimized performance when running the latest games.

The Celeron Dual-Core 867 and the Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz both have 2 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Celeron Dual-Core 867 and the Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Celeron Dual-Core 867 and the Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz are from the same family of CPUs, and thus their clock speeds are directly comparable. With this in mind, it is safe to say that with a 0.1 GHz faster base clock rate, the Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz manages to provide marginally better performance than the Celeron Dual-Core 867.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Celeron Dual-Core 867 and the Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz have the same L2 cache size, but the Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz has a 1 MB bigger L3 cache, so in this area, it wins out over the Celeron Dual-Core 867.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

Both the Celeron Dual-Core 867 and the Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz have the same TDP of 17 Watts, and were created with the same manufacturing size of 32 nm, which means they will affect your yearly electricity bill about equally.

The Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz has an on-board GPU, which means that it will be capable of running basic graphics applications (i.e., games) without the need for a dedicated graphics card. The Celeron Dual-Core 867, however, does not, and you will probably have to look for a dedicated card if you wish to use it at all.

For in-depth GPU comparisons with the Intel HD Graphics 3000 Mobile, click on the following GPU overview comparison icon (visible throughout Game-Debate), and choose a GPU from the list to compare against:

On-board GPUs tend to be fairly awful in comparison to dedicated cards from the likes of AMD or Nvidia, but as they are built into the CPU, they also tend to be cheaper and require far less power to run (this makes them a good choice for laptops). We would recommend a dedicated card for running the latest games, but integrated GPUs are improving all the time and casual gamers may find less recent games perform perfectly acceptably.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
MoBo SocketBGA 1023rPGA 988A / B / Socket G1 / G2
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date01 Jan 201201 Oct 2011
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores2vs2
Clock Speed1.3 GHzvs1.4 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
Max TDP17 Wvs17 W
Lithography32 nmvs32 nm
Bit Width-vs-
Virtualization Technologynovsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size128 KBvs128 KB
L2 Cache Size512 KBvs512 KB
L3 Cache Size2 MBvs3 MB
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

GraphicsnoIntel HD Graphics 3000 Mobile
Base GPU Frequency-vs350 MHz
Max GPU Frequency-vs-
DirectX-vs10.1
Displays Supported-vs-
Comparison

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size-vs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewSandy Bridge is the codename for a microarchitecture developed by Intel beginning in 2005 for central processing units in computers to replace the Nehalem microarchitecture. Intel demonstrated a Sandy Bridge processor in 2009, and released first products based on the architecture in January 2011 under the Core brand.Core i3-2367M 1.4GHz is a mobile CPU, part of the Core-i3 Series released by Intel in 2010/2012 and based on the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture.
The performance is below average and so most demanding games might not run smoothly at the highest settings.