Select any two CPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Core Solo U1300 1.067GHz Core Solo U1400 1.2GHz
Cyberpunk 2077 3337% 3298%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 4527% 4475%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 3231% 3193%
FIFA 21 3115% 3078%
Watch Dogs Legion 4527% 4475%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 3793% 3749%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 5244% 5183%
Grand Theft Auto VI 5549% 5485%
Godfall 6537% 6462%
Genshin Impact 2502% 2473%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core Solo U1400 1.2GHz is marginally better than the Intel Core Solo U1300 1.067GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential.

Both the Core Solo U1300 1.067GHz and the Core Solo U1400 1.2GHz were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.

Both CPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful CPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Core Solo U1300 and the Core Solo U1400 both have 1 cores, and so are quite likely to struggle with the latest games, or at least bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. With a decent accompanying GPU, the Core Solo U1300 and the Core Solo U1400 may still be able to run slightly older games fairly effectively.

More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much.

The Core Solo U1300 and the Core Solo U1400 are from the same family of CPUs, and thus their clock speeds are directly comparable. With this in mind, it is safe to say that with a 0.14 GHz faster base clock rate, the Core Solo U1400 manages to provide marginally better performance than the Core Solo U1300.

Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 - but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck.

The Core Solo U1400 has a 2046 KB bigger L2 cache than the Core Solo U1300, but neither of the CPUs have L3 caches, so the Core Solo U1400 wins out in this area with its larger L2 cache.

The maximum Thermal Design Power is the power in Watts that the CPU will consume in the worst case scenario. The lithography is the semiconductor manufacturing technology being used to create the CPU - the smaller this is, the more transistors that can be fit into the CPU, and the closer the connections. For both the lithography and the TDP, it is the lower the better, because a lower number means a lower amount of power is necessary to run the CPU, and consequently a lower amount of heat is produced.

Both the Core Solo U1300 and the Core Solo U1400 have the same TDP of 6 Watts, and were created with the same manufacturing size of 65 nm, which means they will affect your yearly electricity bill about equally.

CPU Core Details

CPU CodenameYonahYonah
MoBo SocketSocket 479Socket 479
Notebook CPUyesyes
Release Date23 Apr 200623 Apr 2006
CPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved

CPU Technical Specifications

CPU Cores1vs1
Clock Speed1.06 GHzvs1.2 GHz
Turbo Frequency-vs-
System Bus 533 MHzvs-
Max TDP6 Wvs6 W
Lithography65 nmvs65 nm
Bit Width32 Bitvs-
Voltage Range0.85V - 1.1V KBvs-
Virtualization Technologyyesvsno
Comparison

CPU Cache and Memory

L1 Cache Size64 KBvs64 KB
L2 Cache Size2 KBvs2048 KB
L3 Cache Size-vs-
ECC Memory Supportnovsno
Comparison

CPU Graphics

Graphicsnono

CPU Package and Version Specifications

Package Size35mm x 35mmvs-
Revision-vs-
PCIe Revision-vs-
PCIe Configurations-vs-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

CPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewYonah was the code name for (the core of) Intel's first generation of 65 nm process mobile microprocessors, based on the Banias/Dothan-core Pentium M microarchitecture. SIMD performance has been improved through the addition of SSE3 instructions and improvements to SSE and SSE2 implementations, while integer performance decreased slightly due to higher latency cache. Additionally, Yonah includes support for the NX bit.Yonah was the code name for (the core of) Intel's first generation of 65 nm process mobile microprocessors, based on the Banias/Dothan-core Pentium M microarchitecture. SIMD performance has been improved through the addition of SSE3 instructions and improvements to SSE and SSE2 implementations, while integer performance decreased slightly due to higher latency cache. Additionally, Yonah includes support for the NX bit.